Resurrection Requires Radical Action!
Sherrylee and I were just in California for a week, doing Let’s Start Talking Training and visiting with good friends and family—many of whom are church leaders in their respective congregations. Much of our conversation revolved around the situations in which their local congregation and other congregations in California found themselves.
For instance, one congregation—very stable and financially secure—was struggling with being very stable and financially secure! Being comfortable may be the most precarious situation of all. At least one of these churches had recently hired a new preacher that was thinking out of their box, getting involved in the community and not staying put in his office!
The question for these kinds of churches is: who gives up first? Do the members give up the comfort of predictability and familiarity or does the New Guy give up . . . .just give up?
Then there were the churches discussed that had had glory days 10-20 years ago, but today they are either below or about to slip below a critical mass of members. They may have had as many as several hundred, but now they are in double digits—low double digits in some cases.
The leaders of these churches are burdened with their dilemma. They know that to do nothing is to die. They have been trying everything they know to do these last few years, and nothing seems to have stopped the constant seepage of members, moving away or going to other churches—usually the lively community churches.
The question for these churches is: in spite of the desire of the few remaining, can this congregation be resuscitated or is it time to pull the plug? As painful as it sounds, even Jesus said that sometimes death must precede life. If planned well, the death of one congregation might even spawn multiple new congregations that have a chance at life. But something radical must happen or life will just slip away.
What kinds of radical actions might result in resurrection of a dead church to any kind of new life?
1. Close the doors for a year. Re-start with a new name, a new concept—and new leaders!
2. Import new people as “missionaries.” Do whatever it takes to support them, both financially and with permission—no, begging them to be as aggressive as they will in penetrating the community.
3. Liquidate the assets and distribute them to new church planting efforts.
4. Seek out a healthy church and either merge into something new or unconditionally submit to the leaders of the healthy church!
Radical is the operative word here! Nothing less will succeed.
The faithful few who keep a church’s doors open are almost never the ones to resurrect it in any form. Regardless of the magnificence of their service or generosity in previous years, there comes a time in almost everyone’s life when they have to step back and let others lead the way. Those who do that graciously finish as great leaders and are well-loved! Those that cling to power or reputation are destined to wither with the congregation or even worse—be asked to leave by the new leaders.
The last of our church groups are those new churches, either new plants or migrations of people wanting a new start. The heady first days of these churches are full of great promise, new ideas, experimentation, fresh wind and fire. I’ve experienced this as a church leader, and I would wish it for everyone.
Nothing is more exciting than a fresh new congregation birthed out of a desire to expand the Kingdom of God.
There are big questions for these churches as well, but for the moment, it feels like enough just to celebrate them!
Thank you for launching out, thank you for accepting the challenge of starting ex nihilo! Thank you for the courage to risk failure. Thank you for the boldness to follow God into the Unknown.
Does your congregation fall into any of these categories? If so, what radical action are you going to take?
Wow. Good thoughts, Alan and Mark. When we “knew we were uniquely right” about the church, we had a mission. Once we became convinced that many of those issues weren’t salvation issues, we seem to have lost our mission, largely because our Christology was inappropriate. Jesus has to become king (unlike Israel, we really don’t want one or think we need one) for this to happen, and we have to see our community as also needing a king more than we think our federal government needs a balanced budget.
Mark, I feel that we are at a plateau and that if we don’t begin a new upward curve, we will be in decline. The radical action that I believe is required is that we begin to see ourselves as “missionaries” to our community. This is bringing conflict in questions about how we do worship, small groups and missions.
Your comment, Allen, is full of insight. Unfortunately, I think the conflicts that you describe in worship, small groups, and missions are the symptoms of the real conflict which you suggest when you said, “we [need] to see ourselves as “missionaries” to our community.” I’m guessing not everyone agrees with you on that. I’m also guessing that many that agree with the idea are not willing to make the life changes necessary to become missionaries. That’s where the real challenge lies, not with trying to get agreement over worship, small groups, etc. What do you think?
Yes, I agree. That is the culture shift that we are trying to make, a culture where mission trumps. I think that if we can get on the same page about being “missionaries” (who we are and why we exist in this locale), we will find creative solutions to the other areas that will help us in this.
I’ve had to do some soul-searching personally. Am I, in reality, about mission? or do I just talk a good game? When I look at my time, I am not being aggressive in penetrating my community. That will be an area of focus for me this year.
[…] Article source: https://markwoodward.org/2011/01/20/church-resurrection-requires-radical-action/ […]
Mark – great thoughts. When we lift our heads, I think we’ll see that this is one of the most pressing questions facing our fellowship today….if we lift our heads and our hearts up. The congregation I grew up in as a young boy is facing this dilemma. I like suggestions 1,3,4. I think the potential for the conflict that comes from differing visions is very likely in #2.