The person who desires to become a full-time missionary supported by churches of Christ has an extraordinarily difficult mountain to climb—unduly difficult—before they will ever reach the mission field. Many never attempt to climb the mountain, and others fall off the mountain in the attempt.
The current support/oversight paradigm among churches of Christ discourages both potential and existing missionaries. The results are too few long-term missionaries which means less mission work and fewer souls hearing the story of Jesus—none of which can possibly be pleasing to God!
I want to challenge us to rethink the oversight-support model for long-term mission work from churches of Christ and look together at a different model of oversight/support that will lead, I believe, to more missionaries who stay longer and can reach more people more effectively.
Let’s first work our way through the whole process of becoming a missionary as it generally happens among churches of Christ.
First Decisions
When someone is motivated to become a missionary, he/she/they usually will go through a series of decisive steps before they actually can begin their work. The basis for all of these decisions is usually the point of first inspiration.
- If they were inspired by a short-term mission experience, then they want to return to the field they first experienced and work in a similar manner to the missionaries with whom they have worked.
- If they were inspired by a teacher/mentor, they will make their choice based on the teacher/mentor’s experiences.
- If they were inspired by a challenge or a public presentation, they will look for an expert (mission professor, missionary, preacher, mission organization.) to help them proceed.
- Decisions about the field of work are most often driven first by inspiration, followed usually by short-term mission experience in a field or a short survey trip. The experiences and information gained are then supplemented with interviews with current and past missionaries to whom the potential worker might have access.
- Decisions about the type of work are more difficult.
- First plans are often very broad plans, such as church planting, strengthen the local church, campus ministry, even community outreach.
- Some plans are method specific; for example, potential missionaries might decide to start house churches, or do children’s work, or do media-based evangelism.
- First plans made by mission teams are often very personality and role specific. For example, the team might have one couple that likes children, so they will plan to do children’s work, while another team member wants to preach, so they will plan for public preaching. Overall their plans still tend to be broad.
- Decisions about means and types of preparation depend mostly on those advising the future missionary.
- Undergraduates/graduate students at Christian universities may begin by taking general mission courses and seeking contact with mentors in mission study groups.
- Some desiring to do mission work may seek out higher level mission training, for example, through ACU Summer Mission Seminar, SIBI Advanced Mission Training.
- A few parachurch ministries offer mission training. Continent of Great Cities and Missions Resource Network come to mind right away.
- Other people will look for short-term internships on the desired field, if possible, with a current missionary.
- Many will work with American churches—often required by sponsoring congregations– and learn to work with and evangelize through an American model.And there are those who will go with little or no specialized training other than their own life/church experiences. This is especially true of those who are a bit older when they decide to become missionaries.
If you haven’t already, go back through this first section and notice the following:
- All initiative and initial actions come from the person desiring to become a missionary, who is most often untrained, inexperienced, perhaps not completely educated, but highly motivated.
- While capable professors, mentors, and friends are available for guiding potential missionaries, the number of options for fields, types of work, and for training are enormous. In my experience, most go along a path of inspiration and least resistance rather than a strategic path.
And this is the easy part! Next, I want to lay out the ways we in churches of Christ have typically supported and overseen foreign mission work—and why it is an unsuccessful paradigm.
[…] Part 1 of the series makes this point: All initiative and initial actions [by a potential missionary] come from the person desiring to become a missionary, who is most often untrained, inexperienced, perhaps not completely educated, but highly motivated. […]
There’s a real need for more parachurch ministries staffed by experienced and passiionate missionaries who are astute at networking with similar parachurch ministries irregardless of denominational origin.
I very much agree so far. I’d like to see congregations take a more active role in the early part of the process.
Grace and peace,
Tim Archer